|
Post by ecolintman on Feb 21, 2015 18:44:50 GMT -6
How would the refs rate Martin Atkinson's game today? All I'm allowed to say is 30,33 43,69 or else the censors will banish me me from laprepsoccer.
|
|
|
Post by time2retire on Feb 21, 2015 21:44:08 GMT -6
I don't have a problem looking at it and discussing it. Which game in particular?
|
|
|
Post by Schiedsrichter on Feb 21, 2015 22:57:38 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Feb 22, 2015 5:53:19 GMT -6
How would the refs rate Martin Atkinson's game today? All I'm allowed to say is 30,33 43,69 or else the censors will banish me me from laprepsoccer. I thought his performance was solid. You?
|
|
usfgk
Data Expert
Posts: 495
|
Post by usfgk on Feb 22, 2015 11:21:50 GMT -6
Not sure how getting most of the big decisions wrong is solid
|
|
|
Post by time2retire on Feb 23, 2015 21:11:20 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Feb 24, 2015 15:09:55 GMT -6
Quite the biased reporting....it is clear that Barnes played the ball...chastises for not calling a PK when the ball struck the player from the back in the arm BUT then says it would be soft to call...and the other 2 sure sounds like players milking what is normal course of play contact looking to get something for it
|
|
|
Post by time2retire on Feb 24, 2015 15:16:11 GMT -6
Atkinson waves the penalty, he blew it.
Atkinson calls the penalty, it's soft and he's a Chelsea fan, conspiracy!
Any team beside Chelsea/Liverpool/MU here and I don't think it gets this attention
|
|
|
Post by smee on Feb 24, 2015 19:37:11 GMT -6
I think any coach other than Mourhino, and this would be a non story. The interviewers are playing into his hands. I only hope the club now gets an FA charge for "brining the game into disrepute" for the nonsense on their website.
The man is a cheat; has been for years. Now other teams are owned by sugar daddies and not just Chelski, he is getting a run for his money.
|
|