|
|
Post by coolhandluke on Feb 10, 2007 12:50:34 GMT -6
teurlings has not played jesuit this season
|
|
|
|
Post by Bish on Feb 10, 2007 15:16:43 GMT -6
pwnd
|
|
|
|
Post by deanz on Feb 10, 2007 18:19:21 GMT -6
my mistake...i should have checked... what do you think is more likely...Episcopal defeating Teurlings...or U-High defeating St. Louis
|
|
|
|
Post by crossthatline on Feb 10, 2007 20:48:01 GMT -6
I'm suprised to see people saying Teurlings winning this game by 2 or 3.
You said the same thing about TCH v. OC.
This could be another 1-0 game.
|
|
|
|
Post by toejobber on Feb 10, 2007 21:10:19 GMT -6
I don't know what the score will be, but Episcopal is a lot better than OC.
Episcopal has a good defense and the top is much better than it was. Episcopal's challenge will be in the midfield. The key is the keeper. He is good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bish on Feb 10, 2007 22:01:23 GMT -6
Episcopal has a better chance beating Teurlings than University beating St. Louis.
|
|
|
|
Post by biome22 on Feb 10, 2007 22:13:29 GMT -6
Why? Just Wondering.
|
|
|
|
Post by flat3 on Feb 10, 2007 22:28:12 GMT -6
It's easy. Bish always loves St. Louis and Episcopal, no matter what.
|
|
|
|
Post by biome22 on Feb 10, 2007 22:35:30 GMT -6
ya
|
|
|
|
Post by toejobber on Feb 10, 2007 22:46:16 GMT -6
It's a match up thing. University has a good defense but St Louis will get its goals. Just too much pressure over the course of the game on the University defense. The University offense relies on set pieces too much. I don't see them matching goals with St Louis. I think it will be closer than most on this board think, though. Episcopal has a bigger upside potential to score. The small field is an advantage. Both BR teams are underdogs, but I'd give Episcopal the better chance at an upset.
|
|
|
|
Post by burgerhut on Feb 11, 2007 0:39:18 GMT -6
episcopal is going to get killed. they have no chance
|
|
|
|
Post by Bish on Feb 11, 2007 0:50:50 GMT -6
It's easy. Bish always loves St. Louis and Episcopal, no matter what. No, it's quite simple. St. Louis and Teurlings are pretty evenly matched. Episcopal is better than University. It's not rocket science. |
|
esungoal4
Starter
Clear eyes, full hearts, CAN"T LOSE!
Posts: 88
|
Post by esungoal4 on Feb 11, 2007 1:01:39 GMT -6
toejobber, episcopal is not better than OC. OC had the best chance of beating teurlings before the finals. no other team will come as close.
|
|
|
|
Post by nolaball on Feb 11, 2007 7:53:41 GMT -6
That would be bad for Episcopal. The game I watched wasn't nearly as close as Teurlings 1-Opelousas 0. Teurlings should have won that game 4-0 by my count. Credit to Opelousas for hanging around but it sure looked like one of those games where the clearly better team couldn't convert. I'm not sure Opelousas had a shot on goal other than the sweeper firing long shots into the box. OC had a chance to go 1 up when there was a scrum in front of the goal. That's the best if not only chance I saw.
|
|
|
|
Post by lovthagame65 on Feb 11, 2007 16:54:43 GMT -6
if teurlings plays their game and finishes thier shots then it will be all teurlings.. i think what makes teurlings soo good is their time of possesion in there midfield... they seem always to have the ball
|
|
|
|
Post by Bish on Feb 11, 2007 17:14:21 GMT -6
if teurlings plays their game and finishes thier shots then it will be all teurlings.. i think what makes teurlings soo good is their time of possesion in there midfield... they seem always to have the ball I thought Teurlings' "game" was not finishing their shots. That's all the ever seem to do. What "game" are you talking about? |
|
|
|
Post by lovthagame65 on Feb 11, 2007 17:43:45 GMT -6
Im talking about their passing game, and not getting into a game of kickball. And i did not mean that finishing is apart of their "game" .. I meant they kneed to finish, in general.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bish on Feb 12, 2007 0:07:52 GMT -6
Well then sir, you have a strange way of choosing your words.
|
|
|
|
Post by foxtrot on Feb 12, 2007 12:27:47 GMT -6
i understanded quite well, their "game" and "finishing shots" are two different things being described by lovthagame65**
|
|
|
|
Post by soccerstud722 on Feb 12, 2007 12:47:07 GMT -6
my humble opinion is that teurlings needs to get back to attacking as a team. against oc, they had players in their box and oc's box at the same time. you can't control the game on a team when that happens. They need to use their wings, get the ball wide, posses and wait for the oportunities to be created rather than trying to force so much. Maybe in the oc game they were worn out and that's why they began to play that run and gun style, but they need to use their technical abilities that are supperior to most of their oponents.
|
|
