what was acadiana's score?

[boomboomgoal]

i havent heard the score of the game yet

[Soccer05]

Acadiana over Sulphur 3-0

[boomboomgoal]

has acadiana's offense been slipping lately, or have backups been playing a lot?

[oldref]

Na boomboom they dominated the game from beginning to end. sulphur had maybe 3 shots on goal and the rams shot all night. the goalie for sulphur had a good game.

[boomboomgoal]

the thing that most shocked me about the game, was that they allowed a goal and once the game is 3-1 its not close to running up the score, you still wanna add points cuz with one goal they are back in the game

[oldref]

i don't know what score you are talking about when i left the game with 2 min. left in it, it was 3-0 did sulphur score in the last two min? as far as running up the score i'm not sure what you mean. if you are talking about the other thread where i said the coach won't run up a score , i meeant running up like lafayette did to barb last night.

[boomboomgoal]

i was talkin bout when acadiana played barbe

[Crip4Lyf]

oldref said:

the goalie for sulphur had a good game.

I know that's your opinoin, but I talked with the keeper after the game and he felt he should have done better. I felt, as did he, those three goals were stoppable.

The first one could have had an extra man on the wall.
The second one well.... the defense shouldn't have stabbed like they did, but he could have had a better angle.
Finaly the last goal was just a direct kicked that sored right over him, it was a nice shot but could have been stopped.

Give Acadiana credit for having many looks a the goal and not giving up a decent shot all night.

[oldref]

i saw all three goals both direct kicks were well placed shots. when you say they could have been stopped what the heck do you mean, THEY WEREN"T STOPPED! the first was a great shot and if sulphur needed another man on the wall it is the goalies job to get one there. the second direct kick was as smart a shot as it was good. once again sulphur was out of position this time the goalie left his line and leblanc cipped it over his head. those arn't bad goals just smart soccer on acadianas part.

[PutMeInCoach2]

nobody said they were bad goals... They are just saying sulhpur could have done a better job, and the goals weren't "perfectly placed" just good enough to get it in

[oldref]

did you see the shots they WERE perfectly placed. the first one was an inside shot on a direct kick. it was perfectly place because that was the only opening that wasn't covered. the second one was perfectly placed over the goalie but under the cross bar. i'd say they were perfectly placed. you can call them whatever you want to.

[beattle09]

the first goal was a good shot by wilks and smart on his part by seeing the gap that was left by only having a 2 man wall, the second never should have happened sulphur should have kicked the ball out when it was on the line and then one of the defenders made a stupid mistake by ducking his head instead of just heading it out, the third was the keepers fault but leblanc never would have made it without the wind the ball just floated into the back of the net maybe he planed it that way but i don't know. However i do know that acadiana had so many chances to score it eaisly could have been 8-0 but they just couldn't produce

[Soccer05]

oldref said:

did you see the shots they WERE perfectly placed. the second one was perfectly placed over the goalie but under the cross bar. i'd say they were perfectly placed. you can call them whatever you want to.

Thats pretty impressive to plan a shot off of another player, it hit a sulphur guy so I wouldn't call the second shot impressive

[boomboomgoal]

oldref u are clearly biased, the guy was just saying how the shots could have been blocked, he never downgraded them so just chill out