|
|
Post by lookatmyboy8 on Feb 3, 2005 10:39:24 GMT -6
Airline plays at WM saturday @ 2
lets hear yalls predictions
last year they played the 1st round playoff also, with Airline winning in sudden death, it was a close game witn WM up 2-0 at half and Airline coming back to tie up the score 2-2
|
|
|
|
Post by hdkjga on Feb 3, 2005 12:33:58 GMT -6
same thing will happen this year
|
|
|
|
Post by AirlineCoachNoMo on Feb 3, 2005 20:36:38 GMT -6
The score last year at the half was 1-0, the second WM goal came about 3 minutes into the second. Airline had two goals called back on free kicks because a player on the opposite side of the field away from the play was offsides. We are getting a Lake Charles crew for the game Saturday. Should be interesting. I don't think it goes to PKs this year though, someone will win in regulation.
|
|
|
|
Post by lookatmyboy8 on Feb 6, 2005 10:06:33 GMT -6
final score: WM beats Airline in PKs 5-3, WM dominated most of the game
|
|
|
|
Post by sockrdad on Feb 7, 2005 12:15:03 GMT -6
AirlineCoach,
How was the Lake Charles crew?
|
|
|
|
Post by airline20 on Feb 7, 2005 12:59:14 GMT -6
final score: WM beats Airline in PKs 5-3, WM dominated most of the game Can't say I agree with that. The game was pretty even, and we kept them out of our defensive third most of the time. They might have had 5 good looks at our goal. |
|
|
|
Post by AirlineCoachNoMo on Feb 7, 2005 19:15:57 GMT -6
For clarification, the score was 1-1 at the end of regulation, 5-3 on PKs because the last Airline shooter didn't need to go.
The crew from Lake Charles did a very good job. There was just one inconsistent call which I also picked up a card for, but otherwise they were consistent and fair for both teams.
The game was even. WM may have had more of the possession, especially after the send off, but they didn't get any kind of quality looks from it. The real key was our inability to put any kind of consistent pressure on them. Give WM credit, they wanted it and came out to fight for it.
|
|
