|
Post by usasoccerboy on Mar 14, 2004 14:03:48 GMT -6
USA equalises in late injury time. 5 minutes added on and Haiti objects to Jamaican referee Pendergrast's opinion about the needed time. Califf scores. USA tried out some new players, but had many of the first teamers, including the entire defense besides goalie. USA played two goalies, Hartman victimised in second half. Supposedly, Haiti took the game to the americans and had the crowd support in Miami.
|
|
|
Post by hdkjga on Mar 15, 2004 7:12:42 GMT -6
I am very disappionted with the outcome.....Hopefully this was just a brain fart. I don't want to put down Haiti, because I am sure they played with passion, but there is no reason for the #11 team in the world to need 5 minutes of stoppage time to tie them when they are playing on US soil. Unexcusable if the US ever wants to be truly known as a soccer power.
|
|
|
Post by livethegame07 on Mar 15, 2004 7:48:04 GMT -6
Sorry but I don't think USA are good enough. I wasn't impressed last year when i saw them play Mexico and all these results aren't good enough to win a world cup. They're gonna have to try a little harder
|
|
|
Post by McScruff on Mar 16, 2004 16:50:43 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by deridderforward#23 on Feb 10, 2006 13:39:00 GMT -6
i agree with livethegame07 i think the only reason usa are number 11 in the world right now is because they play not so class teams in there like region and they win them all hardly loose because of there competitors like trinindad and tobago, jamaica and haiti for instance. if the usa was in europe they would probly not be ranked 11
|
|
|
Post by deridderforward#23 on Feb 10, 2006 13:40:22 GMT -6
no offence to the usa national team, they are a good team but you must admit i am alittle right on wat i said
|
|
|
Post by usasoccerboy on Feb 10, 2006 14:03:53 GMT -6
I am sorry but I have to disagree, but I am pressed for time right now, so remind me, and we can get into more a bit later.
|
|