|
Post by ronaldo11 on Jan 4, 2005 16:01:48 GMT -6
EVERYONE WHO LIKES ANYTHING TO DO WITH SOCCER. SEE MAN U v TOTTENHAM. ROY CARROLL DROPPED A CATCH INTO HIS OWN GOAL. THE BALL WAS CLEARLY OVER THE LINE. THE GOAL WAS NOT GIVEN.
I HATE MAN U AND I HATE THEIR LUCK. OI MSC18 OR WHATEVER YOUR NAME IS....IF YOU SUPPORT MAN U, YOU KNOW THAT YOU'RE THE LUCKIEST TEAM IN THE WHOLE WORLD. YOUR TEAM IS BASED ON LUCK.
YOUR EUROPEAN CUP AGAINST BAYERN....LUCK. THE GAME AGAINST ARSENAL WHEN FERDINAND SHOULD HAVE BEEN SENT OFF FOR BRINGING DOWN LJUNGBERG. AND ROONEY'S DIVE WHICH WASNT A PENALTY.
I ABSOLUTELY HATE MAN U.
COME ON CHELSEA. DROGBA!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Ghandi on Jan 4, 2005 22:30:45 GMT -6
I'm allergic to caps. Now go worship Ronaldo and his awsome Real team. Lets just wait until FCB plays Chelsea in Febuary.
|
|
|
Post by msc18 on Jan 4, 2005 23:48:19 GMT -6
luck comes with skill and work m8...also there are so many bad decisions in a matchday...so when one like this is pointed out everyone goes crazy...it happens to everyone...it's part of the game, part of the mystique, the human error added to the game...the game wouldn't be nearly as exciting and the fans not nearly as passionate without this as you showed above...this it what gives the game its "flavor" and it's part of the game i adore.
I'll admit...bad call...but it happens to everyone...just look into it...the bad calls are usually cancelled out with the good ones...it's part of the game and you have to deal with it
The goal versus Bayern luck...that's a bit bitter...it doesn't matter when the goals in the game are scored...just so as they are scored...they needed a goal late and they got it...simple as that...Bayern broke down when it was there's to lose and they succeeded in that
|
|
|
Post by ronaldo11 on Jan 5, 2005 6:22:15 GMT -6
you dont understand my point. Im well aware that luck normally evens itself out over a season.
my point is that man u HAVE TOO MUCH LUCK. No, they dont work hard enough to earn that luck. So much luck, its unbelievable. Tell me another club in the premiership that has had the luck that man u have had on the pitch!!! Tell me!!! Thats my point, you cant.
More dropped points for Arsenal and Man U. COME ON CHELSEA
|
|
|
Post by Ghandi on Jan 5, 2005 8:11:10 GMT -6
Hey ronaldo, tell me what team spent more money than then #2,3,4 in the EPL combined. I guess you don't need luck when you can buy every player in the world.
|
|
|
Post by ronaldo11 on Jan 6, 2005 7:18:32 GMT -6
our manager is mourinho. cech, robben and kezman were deals concluded by ranieri. all mourinho has done is brought two of his players with him from porto, paulo ferreira and ricardo carvalho, and bought drogba for £1 million less than what man utd paid rooney.
check my football manager 2005 thread everyone
|
|
|
Post by okcool on Jan 26, 2005 14:00:46 GMT -6
chelsae would be no where if they didn't have the money they have. look at man utd, scholes,giggs,the nevilles, beckham,butt-even though not with them anymore- have all come through the academy and we won the treble with all of those players.....and that champions league final against bayern was not luck...bottom line is chelsea would be no where with out the money. if you look back during the 90's two teams dominated the EPL, man utd and arsenal, yes yall may win the league this year but when you start to dominate english football like man utd has done over the past decade, then you can talk........and drogba was a waste of money, yea he may have produced in France but that is France, this is England your best forward is still Gudjohnsen and he has proven himself to worthy to start over drogba.
|
|
|
Post by ronaldo11 on Feb 11, 2005 10:22:50 GMT -6
Absolute rubbish, you cant take money away form Chelsea and no one else. Man U are HUGE spenders over the years. Van Nistelrooy, Dwight Yorke, Andy Cole, Wayne Rooney, Cristiano Ronaldo, Juan Veron, Jaap Stam, Heinze, Rio Ferdinand, Silvestre.....
So all of those players came for free did they??? NO! Man U spent LOADS of money.
You're other point of bringing up players is not that good either. Yes, Man U could bring up young players, but there are only 2 teams in Manchester of note, and both of them ARE RIVALS. You'll never have a young Man City player moving to Man Utd. However, in London there are many, many major teams so its difficult to get the best young players at your club, in this case Chelsea, when you have other teams like Arsenal, Tottenham, West Ham (great academy), Charlton, Fulham, Palace. So your point in about Manchester based players....what about John Terry. How much money did Man U spend on Ferdinand? How much money did Chelsea spend on Terry? Also, Lampard, Joe Cole, Glen Johnson are all London based grown players.
One last point. Guess where Beckham was from? No, not Manchester, but London. Man U's huge reputation pulled him away from the clutches of West Ham's academy.
|
|
|
Post by ok cool on May 19, 2005 18:39:16 GMT -6
you say manu has luck, look at how lucky chelsea has been this season. How many deflected goals went in against baryern munich. not only that, but they also would be no where without roman abramovich. granted manu spends a lot of money, but this guy has spent ridiculous amounts of money since he has been there. with him chelsea gets no silverware this season. and one last thing, Drogba is way overrated.
|
|
|
Post by mozilla on Jul 6, 2005 10:14:31 GMT -6
Hey Ghandi, looks like Chelsea beat the hell out of FCB....what you got to say bout that?
|
|