Post by Wofford Dad f/k/a SJA Dad on Dec 18, 2007 9:36:11 GMT -6
The thread about the upcoming LHSAA meeting to limit club coaches from soliciting players while they serve as high school coaches got me wondering about the growth of the sport in our state, the obstacles we face, and what solutions might work. Admin -- please consider stickying this thread.
First, we know that, as a general rule, soccer is off the LHSAA's radar. A playoff bracket is posted in July of each year. No attempt is made to seed teams in any divisions to create any kind of playoff scenario that makes any sense. The LHSAA will say it's because there's no way to convene an objective panel that can observe teams on a consistent basis to seed teams. But we know that's a cop-out, and complete hogwash. If the LHSAA ever were to green-light a seeding committee for our sport, numerous qualified individuals would step forward to volunteer. We have such an informal panel created within this forum, which would serve as an excellent starting point.
Which brings me to my 2nd point -- I don't follow volleyball that closely [this of course might be sacrilege, considering that v'ball is almost a religion at St. Joseph's], and so correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that sport seed teams for its playoffs? If the LHSAA can sanction a seeding committee for v'ball, why can't it do so for soccer? Do they suggest that v'ball is that much more popular? Is there appreciably more media coverage from local newspapers for v'ball than soccer? I know that when SJA recently won state in v'ball, the BR Advocate covered its q'final, semi-final, and final matches with in-depth coverage. Kaitlin Hatcher, who plays on SJA's soccer team, was the MVP of the D-1 state v'ball tournament. If SJA, BR High, or other local BR teams made a similar run through the soccer playoffs, would the Advocate afford similar coverage? I don't know.
Those of you in New Orleans -- how does the TP's coverage of soccer compare with v'ball? Lafayette, Lake Charles, Alec, and north Louisiana -- how do you assess media coverage of the two sports?
Assuming, therefore, that local media plays a significant role in how our sport is viewed by the LHSAA, perhaps we need to be banging on doors of local newspapers demanding more access and more coverage. The Advocate has soccer guys like Matt Randolph and Matt Samuels in its sports department. I know those guys try their best, but they're medium-sized fish in a pretty big pond.
Perhaps the Louisiana Soccer Association and the local assocations need to be more pro-active in developing media relations. Gary Buete of BRSA does a terrific job promoting soccer in our area, but he bangs his head on concrete walls more often than he would care to admit.
We at BRSA have had a shotgun marriage with BREC for a number of years. There was a time when we considered pulling the plug. But Bill Palmer's leadership has led to a far more comfortable realtionship, and BRSA is funding some $750,000 into construction of ten new fields at the Burbank facility. And so, with BREC's cooperation, we're getting some pr. But it could be a better.
Soccer growth has exploded in Baton Rouge and the surrounding communities. Our membership in BRSA has grown something like 400% over the last 10 years -- and that's even with Gonzales, Livingston, Zachary, and Pointe Coupee developing their own programs.
The LHSAA needs to understand that. Why can't the LSA work with the LHSAA to promote the sport? Somehow or some way, the high school programs need to participate in promoting the sport on a macro[/u] level, as opposed to just their own programs. This is the world's most popular sport. The folks in Bunkie need to know that.
Now, will high school athletic directors be interested? Do they care right now? I suspect the AD's at the NO schools do. How do AD's in the state's other areas feel about whether our sport truly is appreciated or supported by your athletic directors?
And thus, while we're banging on newspapers' doors, perhaps we should also be gently knocking[/i] on our AD's doors, and respectfully requesting[/i] that he or she take a more pro-active role in a.) promoting the sport, and b.) petitioning the LHSAA to adopt a seeding process for playoffs.
What ultimately will happen to the relationship between LHSAA and the club programs? Who knows. I don't think it takes a nuclear physicist to conclude that the reason the LHSAA won't allow club players to continue their assocations with their club teams during high school play is because of a perception that it will dilute the quality of play at the high school level. But it's being done in other states. And if it leads to club players refusing to play for their high school teams, then what has the LHSAA accomplished, other than to run off quality players.
Sorry for the long rambling post. Many questions are posed here. Perhaps I am too naive to think that solutions can be implemented that will enhance the sport's growth and will foster a more meaningful relationship with the powers that be that govern high school soccer.
First, we know that, as a general rule, soccer is off the LHSAA's radar. A playoff bracket is posted in July of each year. No attempt is made to seed teams in any divisions to create any kind of playoff scenario that makes any sense. The LHSAA will say it's because there's no way to convene an objective panel that can observe teams on a consistent basis to seed teams. But we know that's a cop-out, and complete hogwash. If the LHSAA ever were to green-light a seeding committee for our sport, numerous qualified individuals would step forward to volunteer. We have such an informal panel created within this forum, which would serve as an excellent starting point.
Which brings me to my 2nd point -- I don't follow volleyball that closely [this of course might be sacrilege, considering that v'ball is almost a religion at St. Joseph's], and so correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that sport seed teams for its playoffs? If the LHSAA can sanction a seeding committee for v'ball, why can't it do so for soccer? Do they suggest that v'ball is that much more popular? Is there appreciably more media coverage from local newspapers for v'ball than soccer? I know that when SJA recently won state in v'ball, the BR Advocate covered its q'final, semi-final, and final matches with in-depth coverage. Kaitlin Hatcher, who plays on SJA's soccer team, was the MVP of the D-1 state v'ball tournament. If SJA, BR High, or other local BR teams made a similar run through the soccer playoffs, would the Advocate afford similar coverage? I don't know.
Those of you in New Orleans -- how does the TP's coverage of soccer compare with v'ball? Lafayette, Lake Charles, Alec, and north Louisiana -- how do you assess media coverage of the two sports?
Assuming, therefore, that local media plays a significant role in how our sport is viewed by the LHSAA, perhaps we need to be banging on doors of local newspapers demanding more access and more coverage. The Advocate has soccer guys like Matt Randolph and Matt Samuels in its sports department. I know those guys try their best, but they're medium-sized fish in a pretty big pond.
Perhaps the Louisiana Soccer Association and the local assocations need to be more pro-active in developing media relations. Gary Buete of BRSA does a terrific job promoting soccer in our area, but he bangs his head on concrete walls more often than he would care to admit.
We at BRSA have had a shotgun marriage with BREC for a number of years. There was a time when we considered pulling the plug. But Bill Palmer's leadership has led to a far more comfortable realtionship, and BRSA is funding some $750,000 into construction of ten new fields at the Burbank facility. And so, with BREC's cooperation, we're getting some pr. But it could be a better.
Soccer growth has exploded in Baton Rouge and the surrounding communities. Our membership in BRSA has grown something like 400% over the last 10 years -- and that's even with Gonzales, Livingston, Zachary, and Pointe Coupee developing their own programs.
The LHSAA needs to understand that. Why can't the LSA work with the LHSAA to promote the sport? Somehow or some way, the high school programs need to participate in promoting the sport on a macro[/u] level, as opposed to just their own programs. This is the world's most popular sport. The folks in Bunkie need to know that.
Now, will high school athletic directors be interested? Do they care right now? I suspect the AD's at the NO schools do. How do AD's in the state's other areas feel about whether our sport truly is appreciated or supported by your athletic directors?
And thus, while we're banging on newspapers' doors, perhaps we should also be gently knocking[/i] on our AD's doors, and respectfully requesting[/i] that he or she take a more pro-active role in a.) promoting the sport, and b.) petitioning the LHSAA to adopt a seeding process for playoffs.
What ultimately will happen to the relationship between LHSAA and the club programs? Who knows. I don't think it takes a nuclear physicist to conclude that the reason the LHSAA won't allow club players to continue their assocations with their club teams during high school play is because of a perception that it will dilute the quality of play at the high school level. But it's being done in other states. And if it leads to club players refusing to play for their high school teams, then what has the LHSAA accomplished, other than to run off quality players.
Sorry for the long rambling post. Many questions are posed here. Perhaps I am too naive to think that solutions can be implemented that will enhance the sport's growth and will foster a more meaningful relationship with the powers that be that govern high school soccer.